{"id":31,"date":"2014-03-06T22:35:00","date_gmt":"2014-03-06T22:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/?p=31"},"modified":"2024-09-14T22:38:19","modified_gmt":"2024-09-14T22:38:19","slug":"tcia-reports-2013-tree-care-accidents","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/index.php\/2014\/03\/06\/tcia-reports-2013-tree-care-accidents\/","title":{"rendered":"TCIA Reports 2013 Tree Care Accidents"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Tree Care Industry Association (TCIA) reviewed 158 occupational tree care accidents reported by the media in 2013. Of these accidents, 79 were fatal. The average age of the deceased was 40.6, and the average age of the serious accident victim was 37.7.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These&nbsp;findings&nbsp;are&nbsp;very&nbsp;similar&nbsp;to&nbsp;the&nbsp;2012&nbsp;findings,&nbsp;where&nbsp;TCIA&nbsp;recorded&nbsp;84&nbsp;fatal&nbsp;accidents.&nbsp;However,&nbsp;the&nbsp;number&nbsp;of non-fatal&nbsp;accidents&nbsp;increased&nbsp;dramatically&nbsp;to&nbsp;79&nbsp;from&nbsp;the&nbsp;44&nbsp;reported&nbsp;during&nbsp;the&nbsp;2012&nbsp;calendar&nbsp;year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20220127200445\/http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/Picture1.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20220127200445im_\/http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/Picture1-300x166.jpg\" alt=\"Picture1\" class=\"wp-image-304\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Summary of Findings:<\/strong><br>An analysis of the fatal accidents categories revealed the following insights:<br>\u2022 Of the 14 fatalities attributed to falls from trees:<br>\u2022 Six could be attributed to failure of the tree, or a major limb.<br>\u2022 Two were caused by climbing system failure.<br>\u2022 In one instance, the victim cut through his own climbing system. In a separate incident, the victim was tied to the limb that was cut.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Of the 12 fatalities attributed to electrocution:<\/strong><br>\u2022 Three victims were electrocuted through conductive tools or equipment such as metal saws, gas-powered stick saws, metal ladders and un-insulated lifts.<br>\u2022 Five victims made direct contact with conductors.<br>\u2022 It could not be determined how five of the victims made contact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There was insufficient detail in the accounts of the 12 struck-by-tree fatalities to allow any further analysis. Similarly, the 13 struck-by-tree-limb fatalities lacked enough detail for further analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Of&nbsp;the&nbsp;nine&nbsp;fatalities&nbsp;attributed&nbsp;to&nbsp;falls-from-aerial-lifts:<\/strong><br>\u2022The&nbsp;victim&nbsp;was&nbsp;not&nbsp;secured&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;bucket&nbsp;in&nbsp;six&nbsp;instances.&nbsp;In&nbsp;one&nbsp;of&nbsp;these&nbsp;six&nbsp;cases,&nbsp;the&nbsp;victim\u2019s&nbsp;ejection&nbsp;from&nbsp;the&nbsp;bucket&nbsp;was&nbsp;caused&nbsp;by&nbsp;a&nbsp;cut&nbsp;tree&nbsp;limb&nbsp;striking&nbsp;the&nbsp;bucket.<br>\u2022There&nbsp;were&nbsp;two&nbsp;cases&nbsp;in&nbsp;which&nbsp;the&nbsp;upper&nbsp;boom&nbsp;failed,&nbsp;apparently&nbsp;without&nbsp;any&nbsp;external&nbsp;\u201cassistance,\u201d&nbsp;sending&nbsp;the&nbsp;operator&nbsp;to&nbsp;the&nbsp;ground.<br>\u2022There&nbsp;was&nbsp;one&nbsp;case&nbsp;in&nbsp;which&nbsp;a&nbsp;blow&nbsp;from&nbsp;a&nbsp;falling&nbsp;limb&nbsp;caused&nbsp;the&nbsp;boom&nbsp;to&nbsp;shear&nbsp;off.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Non-fatal&nbsp;accidents&nbsp;are&nbsp;not&nbsp;reported&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;media&nbsp;with&nbsp;enough&nbsp;consistency&nbsp;and&nbsp;clarity&nbsp;to&nbsp;allow&nbsp;analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These&nbsp;sobering&nbsp;numbers&nbsp;are&nbsp;a&nbsp;stark&nbsp;reminder&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;dangers&nbsp;of&nbsp;tree&nbsp;care,&nbsp;and&nbsp;highlight&nbsp;the&nbsp;need&nbsp;for&nbsp;tree&nbsp;care&nbsp;companies,&nbsp;along&nbsp;with&nbsp;homeowners&nbsp;and&nbsp;the&nbsp;property&nbsp;managers&nbsp;who&nbsp;hire&nbsp;them&nbsp;to&nbsp;uphold&nbsp;the&nbsp;highest&nbsp;standards&nbsp;for&nbsp;worker&nbsp;safety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cUnfortunately&nbsp;for&nbsp;the&nbsp;industry&nbsp;overall,&nbsp;serious&nbsp;accidents&nbsp;seem&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;increasing,\u201d&nbsp;said&nbsp;Peter&nbsp;Gerstenberger,&nbsp;Senior&nbsp;Advisor&nbsp;for&nbsp;Safety,&nbsp;Standards&nbsp;&amp;&nbsp;Compliance&nbsp;for&nbsp;TCIA.&nbsp;\u201cWe&nbsp;need&nbsp;to&nbsp;transform&nbsp;the&nbsp;industry&nbsp;and&nbsp;create&nbsp;a&nbsp;safety&nbsp;culture&nbsp;that&nbsp;will&nbsp;keep&nbsp;all&nbsp;tree&nbsp;workers&nbsp;safe&nbsp;in&nbsp;an&nbsp;inherently&nbsp;hazardous&nbsp;occupation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(*TCIA compiled this data using Google alerts, OSHA investigations, and reports from colleagues in the industry. Most accounts of fatal tree care accidents identified the tree care company involved, which allowed TCIA to calculate the percentage of accidents that involved TCIA member companies. TCIA found that only 12.7% of the recorded accidents can be attributed to TCIA member companies. Non TCIA member companies are responsible for 72.2% of the recorded accidents. The remaining 15.2% accidents lack attribution due to insufficient data.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>*This article is reprinted courtesy of the Tree Care Industry Association. (TCIA)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Tree Care Industry Association (TCIA) reviewed 158 occupational tree care accidents reported by the media in 2013. Of these accidents, 79 were fatal. The average age of the deceased was 40.6, and the average age of the serious accident victim was 37.7. These&nbsp;findings&nbsp;are&nbsp;very&nbsp;similar&nbsp;to&nbsp;the&nbsp;2012&nbsp;findings,&nbsp;where&nbsp;TCIA&nbsp;recorded&nbsp;84&nbsp;fatal&nbsp;accidents.&nbsp;However,&nbsp;the&nbsp;number&nbsp;of non-fatal&nbsp;accidents&nbsp;increased&nbsp;dramatically&nbsp;to&nbsp;79&nbsp;from&nbsp;the&nbsp;44&nbsp;reported&nbsp;during&nbsp;the&nbsp;2012&nbsp;calendar&nbsp;year. Summary of Findings:An analysis of the fatal accidents categories revealed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32,"href":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31\/revisions\/32"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.arborist.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}